<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>csessums.com &#187; rebuttal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.csessums.com/tag/rebuttal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.csessums.com</link>
	<description>an unlearning journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Designing the Future Without Us: A response to an essay by Trent Batson</title>
		<link>http://www.csessums.com/2010/02/designing-the-future-without-us-a-response-to-an-essay-by-trent-batson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.csessums.com/2010/02/designing-the-future-without-us-a-response-to-an-essay-by-trent-batson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>csessums</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebuttal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csessums.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is article is written in response to Trent Batson&#8217;s essay As We May Learn: Revisiting Bush in Campus Technology. Batson argues: &#8220;We lack a coherent and comprehensive way to study media and learning that would help us make wise enterprise decisions instead of the constant lurching we’ve sponsored during those 20 years. Where to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is article is written in response to Trent Batson&#8217;s essay <a href="http://campustechnology.com/Articles/2010/02/03/As-We-May-Learn-Revisiting-Bush.aspx">As We May Learn: Revisiting Bush</a> in <a href="http://campustechnology.com/Home.aspx">Campus Technology</a>.</p>
<p>Batson argues:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We lack a coherent and comprehensive way to study media and learning that would help us make wise enterprise decisions instead of the constant lurching we’ve sponsored during those 20 years. Where to turn for this new knowledge and wisdom?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>My contention is that this is both near-sighted and patently untrue. Batson himself, a former professor at a large university, clearly suffers from what many at large and small higher education institutions suffer from: individualism. Given the comforts of tenure and the lack of <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Asociality&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">sociality</a> and intra-college mingling that can be <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&amp;q=%22individualism%22+%2B+higher+education&amp;btnG=Search&amp;as_sdt=40000&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_vis=0">documented</a> in one institution after another, it&#8217;s hard to see what is going on in college classrooms much less know who is using what digital media to enhance teaching and learning or to what end.</p>
<p>Batson asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;But where is the field of media and learning that encompasses all this scattered inquiry?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>In my college and many others like it,  it is in the educational technology department. One that is often parked in a remote region of an education college or psychology department. One that you would easily overlook given the culture of  individualism that dominates the institutions. (Perhaps this isolationism and individualism is a leadership and policy issue which should be re-examined by those at a much higher pay grade. Yet, I digress.)</p>
<p>While I agree educators and college professors need to spend more time reflecting on how we, as practitioners, conduct the collegiate enterprise, the chances of this happening are slim on a large, continuous scale. And while this may sound at first like a bad thing, I have come to realize that this is actually a wonderful thing. Let me tell you why.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="kids playing video games" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2530/4110558590_6596cbe4f6.jpg" alt="kids and computers" width="398" height="265" />This thing that we call a call a college education is about to implode. And it will happen in our lifetime. I have heard this over the past decade within the halls of academia, in journal articles, editorials, and blog posts. But now I am hearing it from the students themselves. They see that to succeed in life and develop the requisite knowledge and skills to support a nimble civilization , they do not require university professors. And I could not agree with them more.</p>
<p>As an educational technology professor in a higher education institution, I see it as my job to train and educate the next generations of teachers to make inquiry and participatory intelligence the norm thereby rendering the ivory towers useless (or at least rendering them into wonderful Smithsonian-like museums showcasing relics and antiquities of &#8220;what used to be&#8221;).</p>
<p>Sure colleges can still offer researchers a place to conduct studies of the hard and soft sciences, but it will no longer be a knowledge accreditation agency or a ticket to future success. We will have all that we need at our fingertips and at the touch of a screen. Teachers in secondary institutions will be equipped and available to model the skills necessary for practical and creative living. At least, that&#8217;s my goal and the goal of many educators I know and practice with.</p>
<p>Several months ago, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Paul_Gee" target="_blank">James Gee</a> came to my college and shared an insight with us. He remarked that in the future, colleges of education would become obsolete. That instead, those of us that specialize in pedagogy, androgogy, and <a title="TPCK" href="http://www.tpck.org/tpck/index.php?title=Main_Page" target="_blank">technological pedagogical content knowledge</a>, would serve the other colleges and departments on campus by teaching these professors how to  create robust, engaging, and media savvy learning environments. This would serve both the hard and soft scientists, educators, and students well by deepening each subject matter experts&#8217; ability to serve up the skills and knowledge necessary for students to become the best, brightest, and most creative stewards on the planet. Not a bad vision.</p>
<p>So while &#8220;media and learning&#8221; could serve as a new department or enterprise, as Batson suggests, it could instead become a part of every subject area&#8217;s enterprise. How&#8217;s that for a solution: Let&#8217;s work ourselves out of our jobs.</p>
<p>Remember, it was not that long ago that universities employed a <a title="educause article" href="http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume44/ANewDayIsDawning/171785" target="_blank">Dean of Electricity</a>.</p>
<p>Image: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2530/4110558590_6596cbe4f6.jpg</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.csessums.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fdesigning-the-future-without-us-a-response-to-an-essay-by-trent-batson%2F&amp;title=Designing%20the%20Future%20Without%20Us%3A%20A%20response%20to%20an%20essay%20by%20Trent%20Batson"><img src="http://www.csessums.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csessums.com/2010/02/designing-the-future-without-us-a-response-to-an-essay-by-trent-batson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

